PDA

View Full Version : New Aids vaccine 31% effective



Momtezuma Tuatara
24-09-09, 07:14 PM
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2009/sep/24/vaccine-helps-prevent-aids-infection/?source=newsletter_must-read-stories-today_more_news_carousel&page=2

Thursday, September 24, 2009

Vaccine helps prevent AIDS infection


Marilynn Marchione and Michael Casey ASSOCIATED PRESS
BANGKOK

For the first time, an experimental vaccine has prevented infection with the AIDS virus, a watershed event in the deadly epidemic and a surprising result. Recent failures led many scientists to think such a vaccine might never be possible.

The vaccine cut the risk of becoming infected with HIV by more than 31 percent in the world's largest AIDS vaccine trial of more than 16,000 volunteers in Thailand, researchers announced Thursday in Bangkok.

Even though the benefit is modest, "it's the first evidence that we could have a safe and effective preventive vaccine," Col. Jerome Kim said in a telephone interview. He helped lead the study for the U.S. Army, which sponsored it with the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases.
The institute's director, Dr. Anthony Fauci, warned that this is "not the end of the road," but said he was surprised and very pleased by the outcome.

"It gives me cautious optimism about the possibility of improving this result" and developing a more effective AIDS vaccine, Fauci said in a telephone interview. "This is something that we can do."

Even a marginally helpful vaccine could have a big impact. Every day, 7,500 people worldwide are newly infected with HIV; 2 million died of AIDS in 2007, the U.N. agency UNAIDS estimates.

"Today marks an historic milestone," said Mitchell Warren, executive director of the AIDS Vaccine Advocacy Coalition, an international group that has worked toward develping a vaccine.

"It will take time and resources to fully analyze and understand the data, but there is little doubt that this finding will energize and redirect the AIDS vaccine field," he said in a statement.

The Thailand Ministry of Public Health conducted the study, which used strains of HIV common in Thailand. Whether such a vaccine would work against other strains in the U.S., Africa or elsewhere in the world is unknown, scientists stressed.

The study actually tested a two-vaccine combo in a "prime-boost" approach, where the first one primes the immune system to attack HIV and the second one strengthens the response.

They are ALVAC, from Sanofi Pasteur, the vaccine division of French drugmaker Sanofi-Aventis; and AIDSVAX, originally developed by VaxGen Inc. and now held by Global Solutions for Infectious Diseases, a nonprofit founded by some former VaxGen employees.

ALVAC uses canarypox, a bird virus altered so it can't cause human disease, to ferry synthetic versions of three HIV genes into the body. AIDSVAX contains a genetically engineered version of a protein on HIV's surface. The vaccines are not made from whole virus -- dead or alive -- and cannot cause HIV.

Neither vaccine in the study prevented HIV infection when tested individually in earlier trials, and dozens of scientists had called the new one futile when it began in 2003.

"I really didn't have high hopes at all that we would see a positive result," Fauci confessed.

The results proved the skeptics wrong.

"The combination is stronger than each of the individual members," said the Army's Kim.

The study tested the combo in HIV-negative Thai men and women ages 18 to 30 at average risk of becoming infected. Half received four "priming" doses of ALVAC and two "boost" doses of AIDSVAX over six months. The others received dummy shots. No one knew who got what until the study ended.

All were given condoms, counseling and treatment for any sexually transmitted infections, and were tested every six months for HIV. Any who became infected were given free treatment with antiviral medicines.
Participants were followed for three years after vaccination ended.

Results: New infections occurred in 51 of the 8,197 given vaccine and in 74 of the 8,198 who received dummy shots. That worked out to a 31 percent lower risk of infection for the vaccine group.

The vaccine had no effect on levels of HIV in the blood of those who did become infected. That had been another goal of the study -- seeing whether the vaccine could limit damage to the immune system and help keep infected people from developing full-blown AIDS.

That result is "one of the most important and intriguing findings of this trial," Fauci said. It suggests that the signs scientists have been using to gauge whether a vaccine was actually giving protection may not be valid.
"It is conceivable that we haven't even identified yet" what really shows immunity, which is both "important and humbling" after decades of vaccine research, Fauci said.

Details of the $105 million study will be given at a vaccine conference in Paris in October.

This is the third big vaccine trial since 1983, when HIV was identified as the cause of AIDS. In 2007, Merck & Co. stopped a study of its experimental vaccine after seeing it did not prevent HIV infection. Later analysis suggested the vaccine might even raise the risk of infection in certain men. The vaccine itself did not cause infection.

In 2003, AIDSVAX flunked two large trials -- the first late-stage tests of any AIDS vaccine at the time.

It is unclear whether vaccine makers will seek to license the two-vaccine combo in Thailand. Before the trial began, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration said other studies would be needed before the vaccine could be considered for U.S. licensing.

Also unclear is whether Thai volunteers who received dummy shots will now be offered the vaccine. Researchers had said they would do so if the vaccine showed clear benefit -- defined as reducing the risk of infection by at least 50 percent.

Those issues, plus how to proceed with future studies, will be discussed among the governments, study sponsors and companies involved in the trial, Kim said. Scientists want to know how long will protection last, whether booster shots will be needed, and whether the vaccine helps prevent infection in gay men and injection drug users, since it was tested mostly in heterosexuals in the Thai trial.

The study was done in Thailand because U.S. Army scientists did pivotal research in that country when the AIDS epidemic emerged there, isolating virus strains and providing genetic information on them to vaccine makers. The Thai government also strongly supported the idea of doing the study.

bbrandonsmom
24-09-09, 10:20 PM
If they just gave out the vaccine, and sent everyone on thier way, how can they be assured the people were exposed to the virus? How can thier numbers be correct based on that fact? I'm sure there is a percent in that 3yrs that never had contact with the virus.

magical1
25-09-09, 06:11 AM
If they just gave out the vaccine, and sent everyone on thier way, how can they be assured the people were exposed to the virus? How can thier numbers be correct based on that fact? I'm sure there is a percent in that 3yrs that never had contact with the virus.


After reading about some of the heinous experimentation they do on humans I suspect that all participants will have been exposed to the virus through injection.... This would have been sold to them by saying oh well if you get the virus and the vaccine doesn't work we will provide you with all the drugs you need free.

I can't see any other way to gather the data to any credible standard. Hope I'm wrong.

Momtezuma Tuatara
25-09-09, 11:46 AM
This take is interesting:


http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn17847-what-should-we-make-of-the-hiv-vaccine-triumph.html?full=true (http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn17847-what-should-we-make-of-the-hiv-vaccine-triumph.html?full=true)

cartersmom
28-09-09, 10:45 PM
This take is interesting:


http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn17847-what-should-we-make-of-the-hiv-vaccine-triumph.html?full=true (http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn17847-what-should-we-make-of-the-hiv-vaccine-triumph.html?full=true)


oooooo totally OT but I take issue with that circumcision comment!

Momtezuma Tuatara
29-09-09, 10:40 AM
So what will happen is that people who believe that circumcision works, and the vaccine works, will ditch condoms, go rampantly unsafe, and HIV numbers will skyrocket and blow out the roof :rolleyes:

MinorityView
29-09-09, 11:18 AM
Always the optimist...

Nirvana
01-10-09, 04:01 PM
Where can I find the exact details of this experiment?

I am having a hard time wrapping my head around the figures they have come with. First off 31% doesn't seem too good a protection figure. How did they make sure that all the participants were at equal risk. If some were more at risk than others then how did they divide the group without any errors.

Nirvana
01-10-09, 08:03 PM
http://blog.newsweek.com/blogs/thehumancondition/archive/2009/09/24/good-news-from-the-hiv-vaccine-trial-the-maybe-cure-that-almost-wasn-t.aspx

Good News From the HIV Vaccine Trial: The Success That Came From Failure

Newsweek
by Mary Carmichael

Last year the prospects for an HIV vaccine looked so bleak that some scientists began to talk about calling off the search all together (http://www.independent.co.uk/news/science/is-it-time-to-give-up-the-search-for-an-aids-vaccine-814737.html). But today, the AIDS research community is reenergized—and surprised—by new data showing for the first time that a vaccine can partly stop transmission of the virus in humans.

Many in the community had not expected the vaccine to succeed, and they still don't understand exactly how it works. It's “a humbling reminder of how little we actually know,” says Anthony Fauci, director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, which helped fund the trial. But it’s also the best lead the field has produced in a decade—and that means that instead of stopping the search for a fully effective AIDS vaccine, it’s time to rev things up.

The vaccine, which was tested in Thailand by a collaboration of global health organizations, cut down on transmission of the virus by almost a third (8,000 volunteers received the vaccine, and 51 of them became infected afterward; 8,000 more received a placebo, and a higher number—74—became infected). The vaccine's 31 percent success rate falls far short of the 80 percent that public-health officials like to see before licensing a product for wide use. On the other hand, it’s much better than zero percent effective, and that’s the outcome a lot of people were expecting.

“If you had asked me to bet money last week, this was probably the least likely result I would have bet on,” says Mitchell Warren, executive director of AVAC, the Aids Vaccine Advocacy Coalition (http://www.avac.org/). The trial sounded so futile to some that one advocacy group called for its end in 2005 (http://www.thebody.com/content/art1676.html), saying it was “squandering public goodwill and scarce research funds to boot.”

Why were people so pessimistic about the Thai trial? The AIDS vaccine field is littered with failed experiments, and this one had some precedents that were especially discouraging. The vaccine is made of two parts, neither of which had worked in previous human trials. One of the two components, a formulation called AIDSVAX, flopped in a large trial in 2003 when given on its own. AIDSVAX caused the human body to make antibodies against HIV, but the antibodies were never a close enough match to latch onto and attack the fast-mutating virus.

After that disappointment, researchers turned away from the antibody approach and focused on a vaccine that tried to deploy another facet of the immune system, the body’s T cells. A Merck vaccine based on this concept (http://www.newsweek.com/id/68822) of "cellular immunity" showed real potential in monkeys, but it didn't work in humans—and it may have even increased the risk of infection in some patients. Soon after the news broke, some scientists began to wonder if the entire search for a vaccine was futile.

By that time, though, the Thai trial was already underway. Unlike the AIDSVAX and Merck trials, it was testing a new double-barreled strategy against the virus—the “prime boost” method, which conditions the body to attack HIV and then bolsters the immune system's ongoing response. How exactly it might do that is unclear—no other vaccine works that way—but investigators who have seen the Thai data have a theory. The vaccine may first cause the body to produce an unusual class of antibodies that can pump up the power of immune cells called “T effectors.” These cells are then able to attack the virus before it can establish a home in the body. That means the major debate among AIDS vaccine researchers—should we use antibodies, or should we use T cells?— is now somewhat moot. It turns out we may need both.

There’s a lot more research to do on the Thai vaccine, then—starting with a detailed look at the 31 percent of people who were protected against the virus. Scientists need to know what exactly was shielding them from infection and whether that shield remains strong in the long term. They’ll also need to follow the unlucky 69 percent who did get infected during the trial to see if they fare any better, health-wise, than people who never received a vaccine. They’ll need to design more trials of the Thai vaccine, which has only been tested on the B and E strains of HIV that circulate in Southeast Asia, not the C strain that dominates in Africa. Most of all, of course, they’ll need to figure out a way to increase the vaccine’s effectiveness from 31 percent to something much higher. The planning is likely to start in October when the more results from the trial are released at an international conference in Paris.

Research on related strategies will continue as well; today alone, two new initiatives are being launched to study antibody-based approaches. One, at the Scripps Research Institute, is based on groundbreaking research published just three weeks ago (http://www.aaas.org/news/releases/2009/0903sp_vaccine.shtml) in the journal Science, describing two newly discovered potent antibodies against HIV. The other (http://covalentimmunology.org/), spearheaded by a foundation called Covalent Immunology, involves chemical manipulation of the same AIDSVAX formulation used in Thailand; it may make it even more powerful.

Just a few hours after the Thai vaccine researchers announced their success, an advocacy group sent out a press release warning that the vaccine breakthrough shouldn't distract attention from treatment programs and on-the-ground prevention efforts. “News of a successful HIV AIDS vaccine trial is welcome,” read the statement from ActionAid (http://www.actionaid.org/pages.aspx?PageID=34&ItemID=499), “but treating existing infections and fighting the underlying epidemic of violence against women remain more important priorities.” The sentiment is understandable. The Thai vaccine works in only a third of people while treatment works for many more; a truly effective vaccine is still years (and probably billions of dollars) in the making while treatment is available now. And stopping sexual assault obviously has benefits for women far beyond preventing AIDS.

Ultimately, though, a vaccine is the only thing that’s going to wipe out HIV. Yes, there are drugs and public-health programs in place today, but 3.1 million people still die of AIDS every year, a fifth of them children. “At the end of the day, nobody’s ever completely controlled a major viral epidemic without a vaccine,” says Seth Berkley, CEO of the International AIDS Vaccine Initiative. “And that is the goal–to end this pandemic. People are talking about AIDS as a chronic disease. We don’t want it as a chronic disease. We want it gone.” At least now there’s a glimmer of hope that someday it will be.
Carmichael is a senior writer at NEWSWEEK




They have no idea how the vaccine works. They just want AIDS to be gone. THe only way it will be gone is with a vaccine. Wonderful and reassuring!