VAERS : vaccine induced flu ?

[Fièvre]

on this site ( Last Updated: Tue, 11/24/2009 )
https://www.judicialwatch.org/foiablog/2009/nov/over-1000-adverse-reactions-h1n1-vaccine-october


VAERS reports also suggest that in some cases, the vaccine could be causing H1N1 flu.

How shall this be understood :


The VAERS procedure registred suspected cases of vaccine induced flu that authorities will examine to latter state wether or not such flu cases were vaccine induced ?
The authorities have already checked these cases and are sure the patients weren't ill from flu before vaccination : they are definitly sure flu was vaccine induced ?[ in France I haven't heard of such cases yet ]

[Fièvre]

I got the answer at the official site (http://vaers.hhs.gov/resources/2009H1N1Summary_Nov19.pdf )
The report of an adverse event to VAERS does not confirm that a vaccine caused the event. It only indicates that the event occurred sometime after administration of the vaccine. Proof that the event was caused by the vaccine is NOT required in order for VAERS to accept the report.

So I guess the answer is N°1 (The VAERS procedure registred suspected cases of vaccine induced flu that authorities will examine to latter state wether or not such flu cases were vaccine induced ?)

Judicialwatch should have warned its readers of this !???

[jules]

the live nasal mist could cause case(s) in person(s) receiving or spread it to others.

The injection is suppose to be 'dead' but imo, who knows..maybe some weren't, and like other flu vaccines, some can and do cause the illness in the one receiving.

Then Canada and US had recalled vaccines due to stoarge issues deeming them lower efficacy and/or other. But whose to say something else wasn't going on they aren't saying.