Fièvre
21-05-10, 06:40 PM
On his website, Dr Girard wrote :
Compared to the parliamentary committees dealing with the management of the H1N1 flu and of which we can appreciate the pathetic benevolence on a daily basis, the commission demanded by 210 Members of the European Parliament was the only one to have, at the onset, aimed for a regulatory technical audit by the EMA, the agency having authorized the new vaccines. It is the only commission which could have allowed us, for example, to understand how a mass vaccination campaign could have been authorized at the end of a development botched up in two months, based on evidence of questionable efficiency and which resulted in particular in seven totally unexplained deaths.
This commission is the only one which could have allowed, consequently, to gather information on the state of decay to which are reduced the pharmaceutical evaluation procedures such as they have insidiously been put into place by the European Authorities since the directive EEC/65/65. This commission is the only one which could have allowed, on a paradigmatic business, to shed light in quite a striking manner on the influence predatory lobbies exert on political authorities. We understand why European Parliament officials might have conspired to abort this project of commission: they had seen it coming perfectly well – and they knew it could be terrible…
http://www.rolandsimion.org/spip.php?article139
Compared to the parliamentary committees dealing with the management of the H1N1 flu and of which we can appreciate the pathetic benevolence on a daily basis, the commission demanded by 210 Members of the European Parliament was the only one to have, at the onset, aimed for a regulatory technical audit by the EMA, the agency having authorized the new vaccines. It is the only commission which could have allowed us, for example, to understand how a mass vaccination campaign could have been authorized at the end of a development botched up in two months, based on evidence of questionable efficiency and which resulted in particular in seven totally unexplained deaths.
This commission is the only one which could have allowed, consequently, to gather information on the state of decay to which are reduced the pharmaceutical evaluation procedures such as they have insidiously been put into place by the European Authorities since the directive EEC/65/65. This commission is the only one which could have allowed, on a paradigmatic business, to shed light in quite a striking manner on the influence predatory lobbies exert on political authorities. We understand why European Parliament officials might have conspired to abort this project of commission: they had seen it coming perfectly well – and they knew it could be terrible…
http://www.rolandsimion.org/spip.php?article139