Quickening
22-02-09, 10:18 PM
Australian media report: http://www.theage.com.au/national/adults-most-at-risk-in-mumps-comeback-20081019-53zv.html
The researchers said the rise [in adults getting mumps] was due to the waning effect of the vaccine over time and an increase in the number of unvaccinated people.
The media report is referring to this research below.
Medical Journal of Australia: http://www.mja.com.au/public/issues/189_08_201008/sen10220_fm.html#0_i1092153
Before the introduction of mass vaccination programs, mumps primarily affected 5–9-year-old children, but more recent (and large) outbreaks have mainly affected adolescents and adults.5 (http://www.mja.com.au/public/issues/189_08_201008/sen10220_fm.html#0_i1092159),6 (http://www.mja.com.au/public/issues/189_08_201008/sen10220_fm.html#0_i1092161) In 2004–2005 in the United Kingdom, more than 56 000 clinical cases of mumps were notified, with the majority of confirmed cases occurring in 15–24-year-olds.7 (http://www.mja.com.au/public/issues/189_08_201008/sen10220_fm.html#0_i1092163) This change is clinically important, as mumps tends to be more severe in adolescents and adults than in children.8 (http://www.mja.com.au/public/issues/189_08_201008/sen10220_fm.html#0_i1092165) Furthermore, some complications such as orchitis are limited to post-pubertal infection.
:LMAO:So when unvaccinated populations were at their PEAK, mumps primarily affected 5-9 year olds (the at most LOW RISK population), and when vaccination coverage started and rose, mumps started to primarily affect adults (the at most HIGH RISK population)... and they reckon its because of UNVACCINATED PEOPLE? :LMAO::LMAO::LMAO::LMAO::LMAO:
The researchers said the rise [in adults getting mumps] was due to the waning effect of the vaccine over time and an increase in the number of unvaccinated people.
The media report is referring to this research below.
Medical Journal of Australia: http://www.mja.com.au/public/issues/189_08_201008/sen10220_fm.html#0_i1092153
Before the introduction of mass vaccination programs, mumps primarily affected 5–9-year-old children, but more recent (and large) outbreaks have mainly affected adolescents and adults.5 (http://www.mja.com.au/public/issues/189_08_201008/sen10220_fm.html#0_i1092159),6 (http://www.mja.com.au/public/issues/189_08_201008/sen10220_fm.html#0_i1092161) In 2004–2005 in the United Kingdom, more than 56 000 clinical cases of mumps were notified, with the majority of confirmed cases occurring in 15–24-year-olds.7 (http://www.mja.com.au/public/issues/189_08_201008/sen10220_fm.html#0_i1092163) This change is clinically important, as mumps tends to be more severe in adolescents and adults than in children.8 (http://www.mja.com.au/public/issues/189_08_201008/sen10220_fm.html#0_i1092165) Furthermore, some complications such as orchitis are limited to post-pubertal infection.
:LMAO:So when unvaccinated populations were at their PEAK, mumps primarily affected 5-9 year olds (the at most LOW RISK population), and when vaccination coverage started and rose, mumps started to primarily affect adults (the at most HIGH RISK population)... and they reckon its because of UNVACCINATED PEOPLE? :LMAO::LMAO::LMAO::LMAO::LMAO: